12/26/11

China vows to speed up convergence of TV, Internet, phone in 2012 – Xinhua | English.news.cn

BEIJING, Dec. 26 (Xinhua) — China will push ahead the convergence of television, Internet and telecom services in 2012, said Miao Wei, minister of Industry and Information Technology, Monday.

The government will expand pilot projects to all the municipalities, provincial capitals and other eligible cities next year, Miao said.

Last year, only 12 cities were chosen for the trial, including two municipalities, Beijing and Shanghai, and four provincial capitals, Harbin, Nanjing, Hangzhou and Wuhan.

The tri-network integration, which allows users to access television, Internet and mobile phone services through a single device, was listed in the government work report last year as one of the emerging strategic industries for priority development and slated for completion by 2015.

China achieved some progress in facilitating connections of broadcast and telecommunications networks in 2011 and was able to provide consumers with products and services, Miao said.

By the end of November, China’s Internet protocol television (IPTV) users have exceeded 11 million, while mobile video subscribers have surpassed 40 million.

via China vows to speed up convergence of TV, Internet, phone in 2012 – Xinhua | English.news.cn.

12/22/11

Chinese price controls will hurt U.S. companies, says Lugar | MassDevice – Medical Device Industry News

Sen. Dick Lugar (R-Ind.) warns that China’s proposed price controls on med-tech products will hurt Chinese patients and American companies.

 

Sen. Dick Lugar (R-Ind.), the head Republican on the Senate’s Foreign Affairs Committee, warned Chinese officials that its proposed price controls for medical products would hurt American companies and Chinese patients.

The letter from Lugar comes as China decides how to best provide basic medical care to all of its 1.3 billion citizens by 2020.

The U.S. med-tech industry is eyeing the future market, but worries that China will opt for price controls that would dig into industry profits and make expensive American devices less competitive, according to TheHill.com

via Chinese price controls will hurt U.S. companies, says Lugar | MassDevice – Medical Device Industry News.

11/15/11

Obama expected to announce increased U.S. military presence in Australia – News – Stripes

YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan – With an eye on China, President Barack Obama is expected to announce plans to boost U.S.-Australia defense ties when he visits the northern Australian city of Darwin on Thursday.

Darwin is the tropical gateway to the Northern Territory, boasting large untapped oil, gas and mineral deposits, as well as vast uninhabited tracts of land suitable for military training.

Australian media outlets reported over the weekend that the two countries would announce a plan for U.S. Marines to rotate through Australia’s Robertson Barracks in Darwin. U.S. and Australian defense officials have not confirmed such a plan, but said closer defense cooperation is likely to include increased U.S. access to Australian training, facilities and ports, and the positioning of U.S. equipment Down Under

via Obama expected to announce increased U.S. military presence in Australia – News – Stripes.

10/21/11

China Proposes “Traffic Rules” for Information, Cyberspace Security

China on Thursday called for the development of a comprehensive set of “traffic rules” for the “information highway,” adding that “the United Nations is the most appropriate forum for the formulation of such norms and rules.”

The statement came as Wang Qun, the Chinese ambassador for disarmament affairs, was addressing the First Committee of the UN General Assembly on information and cyberspace security. The First Committee is in charge of disarmament and international security.

“In this information age, ‘information highway’ has reached almost all corners of our planet,” Wang said. “It is worrisome, however, that in this virtual space where traffic is very heavy, there is, hitherto, no comprehensive ‘traffic rule.’”

“As a result, ‘traffic accidents’ in information and cyber space constantly occur with ever increasing damage and impact,” he said. “Therefore, the development of international norms and rules guiding the activities in information and cyber space has become an urgent task in maintaining information and cyberspace security of various countries.”

via China Proposes “Traffic Rules” for Information, Cyberspace Security.

10/5/11

US lawmaker slams China for cyber spying – Forbes.com

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee has accused China of waging an unprecedented campaign of cyber espionage aimed at stealing some of the most important U.S. industrial secrets.

Chairman Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican, says that Chinese efforts to steal U.S. technology via the Internet have reached what he called an “intolerable level,” and has called on the United States and its allies to pressure Beijing to stop.

via US lawmaker slams China for cyber spying – Forbes.com.

09/23/11

China gone Cyber Wild- Cyber-attacks By China

Are we Cyber-weaklings? For the last 10 years China has gone Cyber attack Crazy.  China is the United States’ biggest creditor and our second largest (behind Canada) trade partner. China’s massive human rights violations, however, are a continuing reminder that the Communist-ruled “Middle Kingdom” is far from attaining the reformed status that is often wrongly bestowed upon it by journalists, politicians, and business leaders eager to  exploit the China market. Another reminder comes in the form of China’s aggressive espionage and cyber attacks.

Meanwhile China has cyber attacked Military, Civil and private sectors all over the world. And we are not doing anything about it because the got us by the short hair. China has been taking in money from it’s manufacturing and seeding the world with that money. While they attack everyone via cyberspace.

gAtOmAlO sAy's -- i LoVe mOuSeS tO PiEcEs -

Lockheed got cracked and not even a slap on the wrist. Were is the backlash for China? As I was researching China’s hacks in the last 10 years. I was blown away. Below is just an example of some of the attacks. Why? Why? Why? Why does the US do nothing? Why do these heavy military players have such lousy security? Why after Lockheed got hit did we give them a lucrative contract to secure our power grid? These are some of the questions that go around in my head till it hurts. Beside the military they’re going after the political arms of these entity’s. And still no response that makes sense to me.

Countries that China has Attacked

China Cyber Hackers has gone after the U.S, India, Japan, S.Korea, the UK, Gremany, Australia, France, Canada, Lantin America, New Zealand, Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Russia, Sweden, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Tibet, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Latvia

China Cyber Offensives

Byzantine Hades, GhostNet, Honker Union, Titan Rain, Operation Aurora, The Dark Visitor, Red Hacker Alliance, Vulcanbot,  Lockheed Martin’s F-35 program, State Department’s East Asia Bureau, Offices of Rep. Frank Wolf, Commerce Department, Naval War College, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez and the 2003 blackout, McCain and Obama presidential campaigns, Office of Sen. Bill Nelson, D-FL, Epsilon’s email address databreach, Operation Shady RAT,

Chiese Spy’s

Larry Wu-Tai Chin, Katrina Leung, Peter Lee, Chi Mak, Ko-Suen “Bill” Moo, Shanshan Du,  Yu Qin,

 

According to U.S. investigators, China has stolen terabytes of sensitive data — from usernames and passwords for State Department computers to designs for multi-billion dollar weapons systems. And Chinese hackers show no signs of letting up. “The attacks coming out of China are not only continuing, they are accelerating,” says Alan Paller, director of research at information-security training group SANS Institute in Washington, DC.

A Wall Street Journal article in 2009 reported:Cyberspies have penetrated the U.S. electrical grid and left behind software programs that could be used to disrupt the system, according to current and former national-security officials.The spies came from China, Russia and other countries, these officials said, and were believed to be on a mission to navigate the U.S. electrical system and its controls. The intruders haven’t sought to damage the power grid or other key infrastructure, but officials warned they could try during a crisis or war.”The Chinese have attempted to map our infrastructure, such as the electrical grid,” said a senior intelligence official. “So have the Russians.”The espionage appeared pervasive across the U.S. and doesn’t target a particular company or region, said a former Department of Homeland Security official. “There are intrusions, and they are growing,” the former official said, referring to electrical systems.

“There were a lot last year.”

Attackers using several locations in China have leveraged C&C servers on purchased hosted services in the United States and compromised servers in the Netherlands to wage attacks against global oil, gas, and petrochemical companies, as well as individuals and executives in Kazakhstan, Taiwan, Greece, and the United States to acquire proprietary and highly confidential information. The primary operational technique used by the attackers comprised a variety of hacker tools, including privately developed and customized RAT tools that provided complete remote administration capabilities to the attacker. RATs provide functions similar to Citrix or Microsoft Windows Terminal Services, allowing a remote individual to completely control the affected system.

Starting in November 2009, coordinated covert and targeted cyberattacks have been conducted against global oil, energy, and petrochemical companies. These attacks have involved social engineering, spear-phishing attacks, exploitation of Microsoft Windows operating systems vulnerabilities, Microsoft Active Directory compromises, and the use of remote administration tools (RATs) in targeting and harvesting sensitive competitive proprietary operations and project-financing information with regard to oil and gas field bids and operations. We have identified the tools, techniques, and network activities used in these continuing attacks-which we have dubbed Night Dragon-as originating primarily in China.Some of China’s Hacks

1) Titan Rain

In 2004, an analyst named Shawn Carpenter at Sandia National Laboratories traced the origins of a massive cyber espionage ring back to a team of government sponsored researchers in Guangdong Province in China. The hackers, code named by the FBI “Titan Rain,” stole massive amounts of information from military labs, NASA, the World Bank, and others. Rather than being rewarded, Carpenter was fired and investigated after revealing his findings to the FBI, because hacking foreign computers is illegal under U.S. law. He later sued and was awarded more than $3 million. The FBI renamed Titan Rain and classified the new name. The group is still assumed to be operating.

2) State Department’s East Asia Bureau

In July 2006, the State Department admitted it had become a victim of cyber hacking after an official in “East Asia” accidentally opened an email he shouldn’t have. The attackers worked their way around the system, breaking into computers at U.S. embassies all over the region and then eventually penetrating systems in Washington as well.

3) Offices of Rep. Frank Wolf

Wolf has been one of the most outspoken lawmakers on Chinese human rights issues, so it was of little surprise when he announced that in August 2006 that his office computers had been compromised and that he suspected the Chinese government.  Wolf also reported that similar attacks had compromised the systems of several other congressmen and the office of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

4) Commerce Department

The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security had to throw away all of its computers in October 2006, paralyzing the bureau for more than a month due to targeted attacks originating from China. BIS is where export licenses for technology items to countries like China are issued.

5) Naval War College

In December 2006, the Naval War College in Rhode Island had to take all of its computer systems offline for weeks following a major cyber attack. One professor at the school told his students that the Chinese had brought down the system. The Naval War College is where much military strategy against China is developed.

6) Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez and the 2003 blackout?

A National Journal article revealed that spying software meant to clandestinely steal personal data was found on the devices of then Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez and several other officials following a trade mission to China in December 2007. That same article reported that intelligence officials traced the causes of the massive 2003 northeast blackout back to the PLA, but some analysts question the connection.

7) McCain and Obama presidential campaigns

That’s right, both the campaigns of then Senators Barack Obama and John McCain were completely invaded by cyber spies in August 2008. The Secret Service forced all campaign senior staff to replace their Blackberries and laptops. The hackers were looking for policy data as a way to predict the positions of the future winner. Senior campaign staffers have acknowledged that the Chinese government contacted one campaign and referred to information that could only have been gained from the theft.

8) Office of Sen. Bill Nelson, D-FL

At a March 2009 hearing, Nelson revealed that his office computers had been hacked three separate times and his aide confirmed that the attacks had been traced back to China. The targets of the attacks were Nelson’s foreign-policy aide, his legislative director, and a former NASA advisor.

9) Ghostnet

In March, 2009, researchers inToronto concluded a 10-month investigation that revealed a massive cyber espionage ring they called Ghostnet that had penetrated more than 1,200 systems in 103 countries. The victims were foreign embassies, NGOs, news media institutions, foreign affairs ministries, and international organizations. Almost all Tibet-related organizations had been compromised, including the offices of the Dalai Lama. The attacks used Chinese malware and came from Beijing.

10) Lockheed Martin’s F-35 program

In April, 2009, the Wall Street Journal reported that China was suspected of being behind a major theft of data from Lockheed Martin’s F-35 fighter program, the most advanced airplane ever designed. Multiple infiltrations of the F-35 program apparently went on for years.

My 2© cents – gatoMalo_at_uscyberlabs_dot_com

http://USCyberLabs.com/blog/

http://cyber.uscyberlabs.com

http://ChinaCyberWarfare.wordpress.com

http://HacktivistBlog.wordpress.com/

 

09/22/11

Cyber China Spy Threat | Cyber Espionage and Influence

China’s growing spy threat is a great article. It points to everything I have said before.

The top priority of Chinese

•            Industrial espionage aimed at defense industry and high tech sectors

•            Infiltration of critical infrastructure and military targets

•            Nexus of organized cybercrime and terrorist fundraising

•            Monitoring and Disrupting Dissidents

We need to understand the Chinese government mindset to understand them, paranoia, saving face and economic these are the 3 pillars of the new communism in China. Let’s start with paranoia. One of China’s prime paranoia, lack of trust of anything not created in China it must have back doors. Look at all the discussion on the Chinese company Huawei, installing back doors in our telecom infrastructure. We did it to them and nowel gatoMalo they’re paying us back. The Chinese know they are putting backdoors in our electronics because they can, they own our manufacturing. China worked very hard in creating kylin (Unix). They have to use Microsoft because some applications only run on it but it’s too easy to hack and “made in America” didn’t make them happy. This is why Google left; they refuse to give the Chinese the keys to the code.

On the same paranoia crazy train.  One of the top priorities of Chinese espionage efforts—foreign and domestic—is monitoring and disrupting dissidents, according to defectors, experts, and official documents.

Anyone who talks bad about China will pay the price, monitoring, I’m currently on there radar (popular posts, referrers and keywords stats on my blogs & sudden twitter followers, say so much) and so is everyone who write about China especially cyber security.

Let’s talk economics. China has been looked at as a source of cheap labor only, they don’t want our breadcrumbs, they want to become leaders not followers and I can’t blame them. As a nation I want to be seen as a leader in Technology, in Finance not the errand boy of the west. (Saving face). The facts are that the last 10 years China has been using it’s money wisely investing in companies around the world (influence), while America has been bombing people all over the world. They create new alliances we destroy our alliance with drone planes. And to top it off they are going after our political elite. According to experts, China uses bribes, blackmail, women, lavish vacations in China, and other means to compromise officials worldwide. I just wrote about this about our current presidential front runner Rick Perry in bed with the Chinese companies – Huawei just opened it’s door in Texas and so did 12 other Chinese corporations, what do you think there doing in the U.S.( http://uscyberlabs.com/blog/2011/09/11/cyber-warfare-rick-perry-mitt-romney-opening-u-s-cyber-infrastructure-china-huawei/).

Sorry I just had to put down these words after reading the article.

 

Time to get down of the soapbox.

 

Read More -

http://the-diplomat.com/2011/09/19/chinas-growing-spy-threat/5/

09/15/11

Huawei Timeline -China’s Secret Cyber Backdoor To The Internet – Cyberspace

DHS Claims Foreign Suppliers Have Embedded Malware in U.S. Electronics http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/DHS-Claims-Foreign-Suppliers-Have-Embedded-Malware-in-USElectronics-832422/
I’ll take the .gov claims and say there protecting our electronic-financial base if they open up pandora’s box. Were in bed with the Chinese right now in this political-financial climate they own us. All we can do is defense for now. My understanding of it is, it’s in our routers and switches who own that space. Cisco, Juniper, Riverbed have you seen there stock -?down?.

Your iPhone or 3G-equipped iPad has been secretly recording your location. Did the Chinese Government know this before we did? How many Government officials (gov contractors) carry and I-phone, I-pad – (and plug it in just for a second to check mail)? Blackberry has some of the same bugs(features). Trust but verify on some things it’s impossible. Just to reverse engineer a basic IC is almost impossible and by the time you do it there are 4 new one out there that have caused the harm already. Made in America and not just -us-born citizens companies they could be bought just as easily.

In the space program once an IC- (any component) is flight certified that’s it. You can’t use any replacement part they must be FC. It does slow up bringing new things to the market but for our national infrastructure this may be the only way..

This paper, “Information Troops: A Russian Cyber Command” is the best  research yet on Russia’s cyber efforts.

http://conflictstudies.academia.edu/KeirGiles/Papers/718775/_Information_Troops_-_a_Russian_Cyber_Command

US – China Economic and Security Review Commissionhttp://www.uscc.gov/

Huawei is a telecommunications big business in direct competition with Cisco. While I have no proof almost every thing I heard and saw lead me to believe Cisco is playing hardball, and they’re doing a darned good job. Every opportunity for Huawei is met with a face slap, from either the Department of Commerce or Senator Kyl, “allegedly” being the keyword, none is direct and none of it is for attribution. All the evidence for and against Huawei is anecdotal at best. That is how big business really works, especially if you’re talking hundreds of millions if not billions in lost revenue at stake.
The PLA connection is not there. The founder, Ren, retired from the PLA in 1984 and was a civil engineer and definitely not a General. Because Huawei is a private company, a a matter of fact, they are barred from a few different PLA and PRC contracts.
Richard Stiennon sent me a great link about a suit between Cisco and Huawei (Cisco claimed Huawei reverse engineered a Cisco Router and stole the design) but if one reads the article to the end there was some sort of a settlement between the two and it was dropped. Again this is anecdotal, there just was no proof, especially when a third party became involved.
I could and will go on but my gut is telling me Huawei is not the evil corporation some make them out to be…

• People this got me thinking about the Cisco-Huawei. I’m a timeline picture kind of guy I put this together to make some sense of who is the good -vs -bad. It’s all about the money and I do see a political angle that I plan to look into- Campaign Contributions. This looks to good to be true – I love a good conspiracy theory and a real one to boot, count me in.
http://tinyurl.com/6hlua9e

US-China trade -273% they own our Tbills and they make all the cheap junk for our middle class (Wal-Mart). Now they’re using our own money to invest in Facebook and go in to Texas. 12 different Chinese Corporation have started business in Texas in the last 3 years.
They hack everything in sight and steal our secrets and IP. That’s why were not spanking the Chinese for all the hacks and maybe putting in back-door.
…..does the actor who is doing it really care? Answer – No

Huawei Timeline
?.  2003 Cisco stops suit against Huaweiwww.commsdesign.com/news/showArticle.jhtml …
Jan 2003 – The Cisco/Huawei battle dates back to January 2003, when Cisco filed a suit against the Chinese equipment provider for violations of intellectual property ( IP) rights.

?. 2003 Defend Our Freedoms From the Absense of Privacy: Hu Jintao …defendourfreedoms.net/2009/08/15/hu-jintao …
May 2003 – In May 2003, faced with a ban on doing business in the United States because of vast intellectual property theft from Cisco, Huawei voluntarily withdrew from the US market.[64] 3Com would have been well aware of highly publicized charges against its new Chinese partner because Huawei was being sued at the time for stealing corporate secrets.[65] However, 3Com formed H3C, a Chinese joint venture with Huawei, paying $160 million to Huawei to capitalize the joint …

?. 2004 Huawei wn.com/Huawei
Jul 2004 – In July 2004 Cisco, Huawei and 3Com filed a stipulation and order of dismissal with prejudice in the lawsuit filed by Cisco against Huawei in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, which means that Cisco can’t bring another lawsuit against Huawei asserting the same or substantially similar claims.

?. 2005 supply channel box, channel box companywww.tootoo.com/manufacturer-channel_box …
Sep 2005 – Channel-Global, Inc. Is fresh lastly startup company and launched our business in Sep. 2005 and is an independent wholesales dealer for computer network hardware, for example, Cisco, Huawei, EMC,… Main Markets:North America, South America, Western Europe, Eastern…

?. 2006 Intellectual Property Right Abuses in the Patent Licensing of Technology …onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747 …
Sep 30, 2006 – As of 30 September 2006, Huawei had 56333 employees, of whom 48% are dedicated to research and development (R&D). 7 Each year, the firm allocates no less than 10% of its annual sales to R&D. Huawei accused Cisco of trying to keep a competitor out of the market, and that this was the real purpose of the lawsuit.

?. 2007 Cisco inks strategic alliance with India’s TCSwww.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?id …
Oct 2007 – Cisco has 18 strategic partners globally, including IBM, Accenture, Nokia, Intel and Microsoft. In October 2007, Cisco sealed an alliance with Wipro Ltd., its only other Indian strategic partner. Naveen Gupta, a director of strategic alliances at Cisco’s Bangalore office, said the partnership would help Cisco penetrate the Indian market and better compete with China’s Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Cisco’s chief competitor in telecommunications networks.

?. 2008 Chinese telecom giant calls off US – It has struggled to gain a foothold in the United States against rivals such as Cisco Systems Inc..In 2008, Huawei and an American partner, Bain Capital, withdrew a request for US …

?. 2009 Huawei and Starent win 4G deal for
Oct 2009 – Huawei has secured the six-year deal together with Starent, which agreed to merge with Cisco Systems

?. 2011 Opnext Reports Fourth Quarter And Full Year Unaudited Operating …www.thestreet.com/story/11126745/1/opnext …
Mar 31, 2011 -

 

09/4/11

Rule stiffens penalties for Chinese hackers

BEIJING – Starting on Thursday, hackers who broke into 20 or more computers will face jail terms of up to seven years, according to a new judicial interpretation issued jointly by the China’s Supreme People’s Court and Supreme People’s Procuratorate.

People who hack from 20 to 100 computers, or steal from 10 to 50 user names and passwords for online-payment or stock accounts, will get at least three years in prison. And those who hack even more computers or steal more passwords will face jail terms of up to seven years.

The latest rule, an interpretation made to deal with online crimes, which were added to the Criminal Law in 2009, also applies to Chinese hackers who steal information from foreign computers, said Zhou Guangquan, a member of the National People’s Congress’s law committee and a professor in criminal law at Tsinghua University.

via Rule stiffens penalties for hackers.

09/1/11

New developments in Internet censorship and control – IFEX

(RSF/IFEX) – 31 August 2011 – The authorities continue to reinforce their control over the Internet in China, which held its 10th annual China Internet Conference on 23 August in Beijing.

Use of the Internet has grown enormously in recent years. China now has half a billion Internet users. Facebook and Twitter are censored but Sina Weibo, the Chinese microblogging website, has more than 200 million users. The public’s enthusiasm for the Internet and the government’s fear of online protests has resulted in constant advancements in online censorship. Weibo, for example, now employs 100 people around the clock just to monitor the content being posted online, according to the magazine Forbes.

via New developments in Internet censorship and control – IFEX.